Northern Arapaho Tribe et al v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service Director et al
| Northern Arapaho Tribe, Jim Shakespeare and Northern Arapaho Business Council, Chairman |
| United States Fish & Wildlife Service Director and Migartory Birds and State Programs Region 6 Assistant Regional Director |
| 2:2011cv00347 |
| November 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Wyoming |
| Cheyenne Office |
| Fremont |
| Alan B Johnson |
| Scott W Skavdahl |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 706 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
OPINION AND ORDER by the Honorable Alan B Johnson granting in part and denying in part 78 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on remaining claims and OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 86 Defendants' Cross-Moti on for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs' remaining claims. "It is further ordered that U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services's Findings for Northern Arapaho Tribe's Permit to Take Bald Eagles for Religious Pruposes and Findings for Norther Arapaho Tribe's Renewal Permit to Take To Bald Eages for Religious Purposes are remanded to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for reconsideration consistent with thie Order." (Court Staff, sal)
|
|
Filing
62
OPINION and ORDER by the Honorable Alan B Johnson denying 59 >Motion for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff Northern Arapaho Tribe. (Court Staff, sth) (Main Document 62 replaced on 2/28/2013) (Court Staff, sth).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wyoming District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
