Staples v. BNSF Railway Company
Gene L Staples |
BNSF Railway Company |
2:2018cv00219 |
December 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Wyoming |
Nancy D Freudenthal |
Kelly H Rankin |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
FINANCIAL ENTRY: Payment of $100 received for pro hac vice fee for Trent R Church. Receipt CHY030331. (Court Staff, sjk) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Initial Pretrial Conference: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 3/14/2019 01:30 PM in Judge Freudenthal Chambers (Room No. 2242) before Honorable Nancy D Freudenthal. (Court Staff, sal) |
Filing 10 ORDER by the Honorable Kelly H Rankin granting #9 Motion to appear pro hac vice admitting Trent R Church for BNSF Railway Company (Court Staff, sal) |
Filing 9 MOTION REFERRED TO Judge Kelly H Rankin. MOTION for Trent R Church to appear pro hac vice; Check not tendered; filed by Defendant BNSF Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Knight, Chad) |
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE filed by BNSF Railway Company identifying Corporate Parent Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC and Berkshire Hathaway Inc for BNSF Railway Company. (Knight, Chad) Modified on 1/17/2019 (Court Staff, sal). |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses, with Jury Demand by BNSF Railway Company. (Knight, Chad) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Chad M Knight on behalf of BNSF Railway Company (Knight, Chad) |
FINANCIAL ENTRY: Payment of $100 received for pro hac vice fee for James K Vucinovich. Receipt CHY030082. (Court Staff, sjk) |
Filing 5 ORDER by the Honorable Kelly H. Rankin granting #3 Motion to appear pro hac vice admitting James K Vucinovich for Gene L Staples (Court Staff, sbh) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gene L Staples: BNSF Railway Company served on 12/27/2018, answer due on 1/17/2019 (Court Staff, sbh) |
Filing 3 MOTION REFERRED TO Judge Kelly H Rankin. MOTION for James K. Vucinovich to appear pro hac vice; Check tendered; filed by Plaintiff Gene L Staples. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Court Staff, sbh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Thomas B Jubin on behalf of Gene L Staples (Court Staff, sal) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (summons issued) with Jury Demand (Filing fee ($400) - receipt #CHY030050) filed by Gene L Staples. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Magistrate Consent) (Court Staff, sal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wyoming District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Staples v. BNSF Railway Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company | |
Represented By: | Trent R Church |
Represented By: | Chad M Knight |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Gene L Staples | |
Represented By: | Thomas B Jubin |
Represented By: | James K Vucinovich |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.