Salcedo v. Transco Inc et al
| Eliceo Salcedo |
| Transco Inc, Alberto Martinez-Castaneda and McLane Company Inc |
| 2:2019cv00125 |
| June 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Wyoming |
| Nancy D Freudenthal |
| Kelly H Rankin |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Richard A Mincer on behalf of McLane Company Inc (Mincer, Richard) |
| Filing 17 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE filed by McLane Company Inc. McLane Company Inc served on 8/6/2019, answer due 8/27/2019. (Lacock, Traci) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Traci L Lacock on behalf of McLane Company Inc (Lacock, Traci) |
| Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Alberto Martinez-Castaneda, Transco Inc, McLane Company Inc with Jury Demand filed by Eliceo Salcedo. (Court Staff, sal) |
| Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE filed by Transco Inc, identifying Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Corporate Parent McLane Company, Inc. for Transco Inc.. (Lacock, Traci) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of complexity by Defendants Alberto Martinez-Castaneda, Transco Inc ; this case is non-complex. (Lacock, Traci) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Affirmative Defenses, by Alberto Martinez-Castaneda, Transco Inc. (Lacock, Traci) |
| FINANCIAL ENTRY: Payment of $100 received for pro hac vice fee for Daniel F Bertch. Receipt CHY031303. (Court Staff, sjk) |
Filing 11
ORDER by the Honorable Kelly H Rankin granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #1 on or before August 1, 2019. (Court Staff, sjh)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION REFERRED TO Judge Kelly H Rankin. MOTION for Extension of Time (Non-Dispositive) requesting extension of Answer to Complaint filed by Defendants Alberto Martinez-Castaneda, Transco Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lacock, Traci) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Traci L Lacock on behalf of Alberto Martinez-Castaneda, Transco Inc (Lacock, Traci) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Richard A Mincer on behalf of Alberto Martinez-Castaneda, Transco Inc (Mincer, Richard) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER Granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice admitting Daniel F. Bertch for Eliceo Salcedo by the Honorable Kelly H. Rankin (Court Staff, szf)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION REFERRED TO Judge Kelly H Rankin. MOTION for Daniel F. Bertch to appear pro hac vice; Check not tendered; filed by Plaintiff Eliceo Salcedo. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Daniel F. Bertch for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order)(Bowers, John) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eliceo Salcedo. Alberto Martinez-Castaneda served on 6/30/2019, answer due on 7/22/2019 (Bowers, John) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eliceo Salcedo. Transco Inc served on 7/1/2019, answer due on 7/22/2019 (Bowers, John) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of complexity by Plaintiff Eliceo Salcedo: this case is non-complex (Court Staff, sbh) |
| Filing 2 Praecipes for Summons filed by Plaintiff Eliceo Salcedo, 2 issued (Court Staff, sbh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Eliceo Salcedo (2 summonses issued; Filing fee $400, receipt #CHY031086) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter) (Court Staff, sbh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/17/2019: #3 Consent Form) (Court Staff, sbh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wyoming District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
