Cases 31 - 40 of 15,887
Clay (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv02544
Plaintiff:
Carleous Clay
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose (PS) v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv02557
Defendant:
Sean Mitchell, Moses Stencil, Nicole White and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl B. Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peoples v. Colorado Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv02016
Defendant:
Colorado Dept. of Corrections, Sean Mitchell, Jeff Long and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Peoples, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loggins (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv02116
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Loggins
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Phil Weiser and Jill Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaramillo v. USA
as 1:2024cv02552
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Matthew Dewayne Jaramillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cordova (PS) v. Lepp
as 1:2024cv02545
Respondent:
Lepp and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Petitioner:
Leonard Cordova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin (PS) v. Gittins
as 1:2024cv02546
Respondent:
G. Gittins
Petitioner:
Michael A. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slack (PS) v. State of Colorado
as 1:2024cv02551
Defendant:
State of Colorado
Plaintiff:
Freddy Slack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chenoweth (PS) v. Lankford
as 1:2024cv02556
Plaintiff:
Anthony John Chenoweth
Defendant:
Lankford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duran (PS) v. Marshal et al
as 1:2024cv02537
Plaintiff:
Joseph Louis Duran
Defendant:
Jill Marshal, Christina Apostoli and Chantel Contiguglia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
