Cases 31 - 40 of 30,978
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02164
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02165
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Battle v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024ct03222
Defendant:
Unicor, United States of America, Factory Manager Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Battle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ORTIZ v. SMITH et al
as 1:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MEDRANO ORTIZ
Defendant:
KERRI A. CABLE, SGT. JACOBS, SGT. BERNIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. USA
as 5:2024cv00526
Petitioner:
Akeem Netron Holder Evans
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Holt v. John Doe Correctional Officer et al
as 5:2024ct03220
Plaintiff:
Orenthreo Holt
Defendant:
Jane Doe Correctional Officer and John Doe Correctional Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cashwell v. Harris et al
as 5:2024ct03221
Defendant:
Markita Harris, Sergeant K. Crudup, Sergeant L. Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Cashwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER v. WADDELL et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Petitioner:
ANTHONY L. HOOVER
Respondent:
STEPHEN WADDELL, JOHN GRAY and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Boyle et al
as 5:2024ct03219
Defendant:
Roy A. Cooper, III, Nancy S. Nash, Lexis Publishing and others
Plaintiff:
David L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. USA
as 3:2024cv00825
Petitioner:
Peter Augustus Wright
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
