Cases 81 - 90 of 96,773
Shepherd v. Angiodynamics, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04169
Plaintiff:
Linda Shepherd
Defendant:
Angiodynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv06116
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. United States Currency et al
as 4:2024cv00618
Defendant:
Real Property, The contents of Social Finance Inc. Account Number ending in 1563, 8.46145345 Bitcoin and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Larson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
David Larson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
USA v. Argo
as 6:2024cv03273
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Phillip Morgan Argo, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Infucare Rx, Inc. et al v. Express Scripts, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01054
Plaintiff:
Homecare Rx, Inc., DM Clinical Collaborations, Infucare Rx, LLC and others
Defendant:
Express Scripts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Warren v. Carnagey et al
as 3:2024cv05060
Defendant:
Brad DeLay and Dave Carnagey
Plaintiff:
Thomas G Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01025
Defendant:
MH Equipment Company, Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. and Kyle Churchill
Plaintiff:
Brandon Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03214
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Seaboldt v. USA
as 4:2024cv00615
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kerri J Seaboldt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
