Cases 31 - 40 of 1,623
Mithun Banerjee v. Timothy Rueger
as 24-1463
Plaintiff:
MITHUN BANERJEE and MALANCHA BANERJEE
Defendant:
TIMOTHY S. RUEGER, Montgomery County Police Officer and RICHARD M. LUTHER, Montgomery County Police Officer
Chantel Johnson v. Achike Oranye
as 24-1441
Defendant:
ACHIKE ORANYE, PEOPLE ENCOURAGING PEOPLE, HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS and others
Plaintiff:
CHANTEL JOHNSON
Bodden v. Walsh, et al
as 1:2024cv01430
Plaintiff:
Levi M. Bodden
Defendant:
Town of Bel Air, Jessica Carpenter, Logan F. Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Colossus Media, LLC v. Adalytics Research, LLC
as 8:2024cv01402
Plaintiff:
Colossus Media, LLC
Defendant:
Adalytics Research, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
APH v. Agle
as 4:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
APH
Defendant:
Andrew Dale Agle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
PH v. Agle
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
A PH
Defendant:
Andrew Dale Agle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Bobulinski v. Raskin
as 8:2024cv01168
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bobulinski
Defendant:
Jamie Raskin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts
RE Carroll Management Company v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
as 24-1342
Plaintiff:
RE CARROLL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, CIP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, CARROLL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT US, LLC and others
Defendant:
DUN & BRADSTREET, INCORPORATED, DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC. and THE DUN & BRADSTREET CORPORATION
Harris v. United States
as 5:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Bobby Leon Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights
Grenell v. Troye
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Richard Grenell
Defendant:
Olivia Troye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
