Cases 31 - 40 of 3,264
Kornegay v. Lintner et al
as 5:2024cv00137
Defendant:
Mr. Harry Berryman, Ms. A. Wells and Ass. Warden Lintner
Plaintiff:
Raymond Kornegay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 3:2024cv00088
Defendant:
Mr. Martin Logan, Mr. Russell Knuckles, Mrs. Kristen Nichols and others
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas v. Fairmont State Police (Marion)
as 3:2024cv00087
Defendant:
Fairmont State Police (Marion)
Plaintiff:
James Lee Nicholas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilburn v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Bryant Eugene Wilburn
Defendant:
John Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spinks v. John does and Janes et al
as 5:2024cv00133
Respondent:
Ms. Ray, SHU Officers, Unknown Official and others
Petitioner:
Joseph Spinks and Joseph Andrew Spinks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirkland v. Raleigh General Hospital
as 5:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Toussaint N. Kirkland
Defendant:
Beckley Appalachian Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shields v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jacob Shields
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe and Lt. Timothy Tibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemons v. Green
as 5:2024cv00127
Defendant:
Transportation Officer Green
Plaintiff:
Richard Howard Clemons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Bureau of Prison et al
as 3:2024cv00083
Defendant:
Bureau of Prison, Warden Ray, Superior Court for the District of Columbia and others
Plaintiff:
Lamont L. Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gum v. City of Elkins et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Defendant:
Corporal Christopher Boatwright, Officer Noah G. Elbon and City of Elkins
Plaintiff:
Randall Gum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
