Cases 101 - 110 of 449,363
DIGITALDOORS, INC. v. Centennial Bank et al
as 2:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
DIGITALDOORS, INC.
Defendant:
Centennial Bank and Happy State Bank
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DIGITALDOORS, INC. v. First Financial Bank
as 2:2024cv00780
Defendant:
First Financial Bank
Plaintiff:
DIGITALDOORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DIGITALDOORS, INC. v. First Foundation Bank
as 2:2024cv00781
Defendant:
First Foundation Bank
Plaintiff:
DIGITALDOORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DIGITALDOORS, INC. v. First United Bank & Trust Company
as 2:2024cv00782
Defendant:
First United Bank & Trust Company
Plaintiff:
DIGITALDOORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DIGITALDOORS, INC. v. Independent Bank Group, Inc. d/b/a Independent Bank
as 2:2024cv00783
Defendant:
Independent Bank Group, Inc. d/b/a Independent Bank
Plaintiff:
DIGITALDOORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DIGITALDOORS, INC. v. Stifel Bank
as 2:2024cv00784
Defendant:
Stifel Bank
Plaintiff:
DIGITALDOORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DIGITALDOORS, INC. v. TruMark Financial Credit Union
as 2:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
DIGITALDOORS, INC.
Defendant:
TruMark Financial Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DIGITALDOORS, INC.
as 2:2024cv00786
Defendant:
Veritex Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
DIGITALDOORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DIGITALDOORS, INC. v. Washington Federal Bank
as 2:2024cv00787
Defendant:
Washington Federal Bank
Plaintiff:
DIGITALDOORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Clark et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 1:2024cv01140
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Plaintiff:
Brian Clark and Sarah E. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
