Cases 71 - 80 of 128
Darrow v. Harrosh et al
as 1:2011cv00388
Plaintiff:
John W. Darrow
Defendant:
Nicki C. Harrosh , John and Mary Does 1-10, Doe Corporations 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medeiros v. City and County of Honolulu, et al
as 1:2011cv00221
Plaintiff:
Wayne Medeiros, Sr.
Defendant:
City and County of Honolulu , N. Ah Yat and Doe Defendants 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lamosao v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv00157
Plaintiff:
Rufino Y. Lamosao
Defendant:
United States of America and Doe Defendants 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Lefavor v. East
as 1:2011cv00046
Plaintiff:
Marshall Lefavor
Defendant:
Cheryl East
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith-Estelle et al v. Deheard
as 1:2011cv00009
Plaintiff:
Allison Smith-Estelle and Stephen Estelle
Defendant:
Doe Defendants 1-20 and Gabrielle DeHeart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estate of Vicky Lynn Norman et al v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00458
Plaintiff:
Estate of Vicky Lynn Norman , Edwin Gonzalez, III , Gleb Ikaika Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Kiyono v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv00418
Plaintiff:
James Kiyono
Defendant:
United States of America and Jonathan J. Lynn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Fujii v. Llavina et al
as 1:2010cv00248
Plaintiff:
Lance Fujii
Defendant:
Jose L. Llavina , John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Engracio et al v. Milum et al
as 1:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
Pedrito Engracio and Herminia Engracio
Defendant:
Marilyn Evans Milum , John Does 1-10, John Doe Corporations 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Abraham et al v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2010cv00161
Plaintiff:
Charles Abraham and Bonnie Abraham
Defendant:
Dawnelle R. Sullivan and Cathy L. Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
