Cases 61 - 70 of 2,052
LaFlamme v. Town of North Kingstown et al
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Alan LaFlamme
Defendant:
Town of North Kingstown, Debra Bridgham, Patrick Flanagan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McGovern et al v. William et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Defendant:
Town of Tiverton and Bailey William
Plaintiff:
Local 1703 of the I.A.F.F. and David M. McGovern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Fantel, Jr. v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2024cv00213
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island and Town of South Kingstown
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
McGovern et al v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Defendant:
Town of Tiverton and William Bailey
Plaintiff:
Local 1703 of the I.A.F.F. and David M. McGovern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acosta v. Providence Police Department
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Robert Acosta, Jr.
Defendant:
Providence Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Rolon v. Fudge
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Angel Rolon
Defendant:
Marcia Fudge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
