Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Guan v. Berger, et al
as 23-1519
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALICE GUAN
Defendant / Appellee:
LATHAM, LUNA, EDEN & BEAUDINE, LLP, DANIEL H. COULTOFF, JUSTIN LUNA and others
Defendant:
WENDY BERGER, Judge, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, and as an individual, KAREN JENNEMANN, as an individual who is a recently retired judge, Bankruptcy Court at the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA and others
Landino v. Massachusetts Teachers Ass'n
as 22-1691
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN H. LANDINO
Defendant / Appellee:
MA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION
Saad Maura, et al v. Scotiabank de Puerto Rico, et al
as 20-1114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMARIS TORRES-NUNEZ, EVELYN MORALEZ-SUAREZ, CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP BERRIOS-RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BANCO SANTANDER DE PUERTO RICO, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
WMPRRE LLC and SUNWEST MORTGAGE COMPANY INC.
Harhay, et al v. Starkey
as 11-1162
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANNE E. HARHAY and GREGORY P. HARHAY
Defendant - Appellant:
NOAH H. STARKEY
Defendant:
GERTRUDE M. STARKEY
Harhay, et al v. Starkey
as 11-1058
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANNE E. HARHAY and GREGORY P. HARHAY
Defendant - Appellant:
GERTRUDE M. STARKEY
Defendant:
NOAH H. STARKEY
Paul Muckle, et al v. Fremont Investment & Loan, et al
as 10-1594
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL L. MUCKLE and IRENE H. WOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
ASC/WELLS FARGO BANK, US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATES, SG MORTGAGE SABC and others
Defendant:
WALL STREET, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, FIRSTFED FINANCIAL CORP. and others
Muckle, et al v. Freemont Investments & Loans, et al
as 08-1467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL L. MUCKLE and IRENE H. WOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
FREEMONT INVESTMENTS & LOANS, ASC/WELLS FARGO BANK, US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
