Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Thomas v. Salem State University, et al
as 14-1883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COURTNEY THOMAS
Defendant:
SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION, INC., BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION, PATRICIA MAGUIRE MESERVEY, President, Salem State University Foundation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SALEM STATE COLLEGE
In Re: Artis, et al
as 14-1718
Respondent:
ANNETTE G. YOUNG, LARRY J. MCCULLOCH, PATRICIA C. MCCULLOCH and others
Petitioner:
SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Interested Party:
SHARON OVERSTREET, PAIN CONSULTANTS OF WEST FLORIDA, ROCHESTER BRAIN AND SPINE NEUROSURGERY & PAIN MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Defendant:
HOWELL ALLEN CLINIC, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Artis, et al v. N.E. Compounding Pharmacy, Inc, et al
as 14-1714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PHARMACY, INC, d/b/a New England Compounding Center, AMERIDOSE, LLC, MEDICAL SALES MANAGEMENT, INC and others
Trustee:
PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center
Interested Party:
PAIN MEDICINE SPECIALISTS PA, UNIVERSAL PAIN MANAGEMENT MEDICAL CORPORATION, d/b/a/ Universal Pain Management, PAIN ASSOCIATES OF CHARLSETON, LLC, d/b/a InverveneMD and others
Defendant:
HOWELL ALLEN CLINIC, DEBRA SCHAMBERG, INSIGHT IMAGING, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN GUZMAN
Interested Party - Intervenor:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, in the Chapter 11 Case of New England Compunding Pharmacy, Inc
In Re: Artis, et al
as 14-1718
Petitioner:
SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Respondent:
NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PHARMACY, INC, d/b/a New England Compounding Center, AMERIDOSE, LLC, MEDICAL SALES MANAGEMENT, INC and others
Plaintiff:
SHARON G. WINGATE, Executor of the Estate of Douglas Gray Wingate, Deceased and KATHLEEN GUZMAN
Trustee:
PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center
Interested Party:
PAIN MEDICINE SPECIALISTS PA, UNIVERSAL PAIN MANAGEMENT MEDICAL CORPORATION, d/b/a/ Universal Pain Management, PAIN ASSOCIATES OF CHARLSETON, LLC, d/b/a InverveneMD and others
Defendant:
HOWELL ALLEN CLINIC, DEBRA SCHAMBERG, INSIGHT IMAGING, INC. and others
Interested Party - Intervenor:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, in the Chapter 11 Case of New England Compunding Pharmacy, Inc
Artis, et al v. N.E. Compounding Pharmacy, Inc, et al
as 13-2007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PHARMACY, INC, d/b/a New England Compounding Center
Courtney, Jr. v. US Bank National Association, et al
as 13-1694
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD F. COURTNEY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, As Trustee for Certificateholders of Bear Stearns Asset-Backed Securities I LLC, Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2007 HE6 and NEW ENGLAND MERCHANTS CORP.
Defendant:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Lecky v. Holder
as 12-2401
Petitioner:
COURTNEY WAYNE LECKY
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Brown v. Judge Woodruff, et al
as 12-1740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG A. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE WOODRUFF, in his official and individual capacities, STATE OF ME, LINDSAY CARRON, in her official and individual capacities and others
In Re: Reebok Easytone
as 12-1265
Plaintiff:
SANDRA ALTIERI, COURTNEY SCHWARTZ and CHERYL HARDY
Defendant - Appellee:
REEBOK INT'L INC
Interested Party - Appellant:
NIKKI JOHNSON
Interested Party:
SANDRINE CASSIDY, EVELINE SCHAFFER SHEKHMAN, JENNIFER BISHOP and others
Nelson v. Holder, Jr.
as 12-1128
Petitioner:
COURTNEY NELSON
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
