Cases 171 - 180 of 10,408
MEYINVI EL v. LAMBREW et al
as 2:2024cv00210
Defendant:
KELLEY GILPATRIC, JEANNE M LAMBREW, SUSAN DRISCOLL and others
Plaintiff:
KEYI LE LATE MEYINVI EL
Unknown:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Bashaw et al v. Reardon
as 1:2024cv11909
Defendant:
Sean Reardon
Plaintiff:
William N. Moseley, Jr., Brandon Hayes and Mark C. Bashaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Acevedo Candelario v. Roldan-Concepcion et al
as 3:2024cv01268
Defendant:
Julio Roldan-Concepcion, Grisell Lausell and The Municipal Goverment of Aguadilla
Plaintiff:
Jeannette Acevedo Candelario
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kynard v. Robbins
as 3:2024cv30092
Defendant:
Kyle Robbins
Plaintiff:
Yogi Lerner Kynard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mann, et al v. Cottrell, et al
as 24-1555
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY COTE and JASBIR MANN
Defendant:
JONATHAN COTTRELL, MICHAEL BERNIER and REBECCA COTTRELL
Cross-Defendant:
RANDY J. SPENCER and KYLE VIEIRA
Rosado Sanchez v. Kalanick, et al
as 24-1535
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DARA KHOSROWSHAHI, GARRET CAMP and others
Plaintiff:
PABLO ENRIQUE ROSADO SANCHEZ
Jones v. Providence Teachers Union, Local 958
as 1:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Stephanie Jones
Defendant:
Providence Teachers' Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Roosevelt v. Lowes
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Theodore Roosevelt
Defendant:
Lowes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Levesque v. New York State Police
as 4:2024cv40102
Plaintiff:
Andre Rene Levesque
Defendant:
New York State Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Marshall v. US Attorney General et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Defendant:
US Attorney General, USA, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Director and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
