Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Robinson et al v. Capstone Automotive Group LLC et al
as 1:2024cv12434
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Robinson and Marilyn Rosen
Defendant:
AMR Auto Holdings - MN, LLC doing business as Prime Mazda Group of Norwood, Capstone Automotive Group LLC and Federated Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Rosen v. Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc.
as 1:2024cv11880
Defendant:
Greylock McKinnon Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Rosen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Drake v. Mitch Rosen Extraordinary Gunleather, LLC
as 1:2016cv00527
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Mitch Rosen Extraordinary Gunleather, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Wax et al v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10285
Plaintiff:
Barry Wax and Kenneth Rosen
Defendant:
FanDuel Inc., DraftKings, Inc., SAAHIL SUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosen v. TMS, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv11515
Plaintiff:
Richard Rosen and Richard Rosen
Defendant:
TMS, Inc. and Warren K. Trowbridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Latorraca, et al v. Taniki Financial Corporation, et al
as 08-2477
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAL LATORRACA, JOHN M. BABINGTON, EDWARD CAMPANELLI and others
Defendant:
A. URI LEVY, JAY ALIX AND ASSOCIATES, MEDIAJET, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
TANIKI FINANCIAL CORPORATION
:
Latorraca, et al v. Centennial Technologies Inc., et al
as 1:1997cv10304
Plaintiff:
Ronald Schwartz , David Finkelstein and All Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Centennial Technologies Inc., John J. McDonald, John J. Shields and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Sal Latorraca , John M. Babington , Edward Campanelli and others
Consolidated_defendant:
A. Uri Levy, Jay Alix and Associates , Bond D. Fletcher and others
Trustee:
H&R Block Financial Advisors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
