Cases 21 - 30 of 50
In Re: Est. of Arthur Barrett
as 14-1236
Petitioner:
ESTATE OF ARTHUR M. BARRETT, by Elaine Barrett, in her capacity as Administratrix, and as an individual victim and BRUCE SCOTT ZISKIND
Respondent:
JAMES J. BULGER, a/k/a Jimmy, a/k/a Whitey, a/k/a Jim and UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
ESTATE OF MICHAEL J. DONAHUE, GLOBE NEWSPAPER CO., BOSTON HERALD and others
In Re: Est. of Arthur Barrett
as 13-2481
Petitioner:
BRUCE SCOTT ZISKIND and ESTATE OF ARTHUR M. BARRETT, by Elaine Barrett, in her capacity as Administratrix, and as an individual victim
Respondent:
JAMES J. BULGER, a/k/a Jimmy, a/k/a Whitey, a/k/a Jim and UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
MICHAEL J. DONAHUE, GLOBE NEWSPAPER CO., BOSTON HERALD and others
US v. Bulger
as 13-2447
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES J. BULGER, a/k/a Jimmy, a/k/a Whitey, a/k/a Jim
Interested Party:
MICHAEL J. DONAHUE, GLOBE NEWSPAPER CO., BOSTON HERALD and others
Barrett, et al v. Option One Mortgage Corp., et al
as 12-8033
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
CECIL BARRETT, JR., CYNTHIA BARRETT, JEAN GUERRIER and others
Plaintiff:
ANGELIQUE BASTIEN
Defendant - Respondent:
OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, H & R BLOCK MORTGAGE CORPORATION, f/k/a Option One Mortgage Service, Inc., SAND CANYON CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
H & R BLOCK, INC. and H & R BLOCK BANK
Interested Party:
BOSTON BAR ASSOCIATION
Doctor's Data, Inc. v. Barratt et al
as 1:2012mc91285
Plaintiff:
Doctor's Data, Inc.
Defendant:
Stephen J. Barrett, The National Council Against Health Fraud, Inc. and Quackwatch, Inc.
Movant:
Robert S. Baratz
In Re: Shapiro
as 12-1775
Petitioner:
JOSHUA BARRETT SHAPIRO
Respondent:
ROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY, ROY J. NIRSCHEL, HEIDI HARTZELL, in her individual and official capacity as Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards and others
Manson, et al v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC, et al
as 12-8018
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DARLENE MANSON, GERMANO DEPINA, ROBERT LANE and others
Plaintiff:
REGINE MICHEL, DEBORAH NICHOLAS, KEITH NICHOLAS and others
Defendant - Respondent:
GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, HARMON LAW OFFICES, ABLITT LAW OFFICES, P.C. and others
Defendant:
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AVELO MORTGAGE, LLC, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY and others
Interested Party:
NICHOLAS BARRETT & ASSOCIATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, et al v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 11-2096
Plaintiff:
PAUL MARZOLO, as proposed Administrator of the Estate of Christine Marzolo, deceased, MATTIE MOORE, ROMANA HAYNES and others
Defendant:
GLENMARK GENERICS INC., USA, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, JAMES P HALL and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF GEORGIA, INC., KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF NORTHWEST and others
Petitioner:
RICHARD W DODD, CHRISTINE MANFREDI and HAROLD SPRINKLE
Not Classified By Court:
CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Defendant / Appellant:
WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC and PFIZER, INC.
Intervenor:
MARK DUDLEY, IMS HEALTH, INC., SUSAN DUDLEY and others
Amicus Curiae:
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, et al v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 11-1904
Plaintiff:
PAUL MARZOLO, as proposed Administrator of the Estate of Christine Marzolo, deceased, MATTIE MOORE, ROMANA HAYNES and others
Defendant:
GLENMARK GENERICS INC., USA, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, JAMES P HALL and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF GEORGIA, INC., KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF NORTHWEST and others
Petitioner:
RICHARD W DODD, CHRISTINE MANFREDI and HAROLD SPRINKLE
Not Classified By Court:
CAROL JANNEY and DARREN MANCUSO
Defendant / Appellant:
WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC and PFIZER, INC.
Intervenor:
MARK DUDLEY, IMS HEALTH, INC., SUSAN DUDLEY and others
Amicus Curiae:
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
