Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Katz v. Belveron Real Estate Partners, et al
as 20-1724
Defendant:
RICHMAN ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC., GINA DODGE, WILDER RICHMAN CORPORATION and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BELVERON REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, LLC, GRANT SISLER, AHP HOLDINGS LLC and others
Interested Party:
PAUL OLDENBURG and BELVERON PARTNERS FUND III JV, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBRA KATZ
Conservation Law Foundation et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 1:2020cv10820
Plaintiff:
New Mexico Wilderness Alliance, Merrimack River Watershed Council, Massachusetts Audubon Society, Inc. and others
Defendant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, R.D. James and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Bell v. Rinchem Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv40177
Plaintiff:
Craig Bell
Defendant:
Rinchem Company, Inc., CGL Transportation, Inc., Paul Boisvert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scarborough Citizens Protect, et al v. US Fish and Wildlife Service, et al
as 11-1597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCARBOROUGH CITIZENS PROTECTING RESOURCES, DAVID T. PAUL, PAUL AUSTIN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, NORTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR, GOVERNOR, STATE OF MAINE and others
SCARBOROUGH CITIZENS PROTECTING RESOURCES et al v. US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al
as 2:2010cv00315
Plaintiff:
SCARBOROUGH CITIZENS PROTECTING RESOURCES , DAVID T PAUL , PAUL AUSTIN and others
Defendant:
US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, NORTHEAST REGIONAL DIRECTOR, GOVERNOR, STATE OF MAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Sierra Club, et al v. Wagner, et al
as 08-1978
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIERRA CLUB, INC., WILDERNESS SOCIETY and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Plaintiff:
FOREST WATCH
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS WAGNER, Forest Supervisor, White Mountain National Forest, US FOREST SERVICE, MIKE JOHANNS, Secretary, US Department of Agriculture and others
:
, , and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
