Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BART FLANAGAN TREE SERVICE LLC v. RKD TRANS INC et al
as 2:2024cv00221
Defendant:
LOAD EM UP INC, RKD TRANS INC and SHYFT GROUP DURAMAG LLC
Plaintiff:
BART FLANAGAN TREE SERVICE LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
US v. Buth
as 24-1131
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMBO BUTH
Claimant:
SATHTRA EM
Jeannite v. Sunni et al
as 1:2021cv11125
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Muihamaud Sunni, Kevin Lyes, Boston EMS Headquaters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hall v. Capeless, et al
as 20-1394
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID F. CAPELESS, in his official capacity, and his personal capacity, MARY COUGHLIN, ROSE DAWSON and others
Plaintiff:
EME, through Adam Lee Michael Hall, Guardian AD-Litem and father of EME, a minor and a victim of defendants
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM HALL
US v. Greenlaw
as 20-1168
Interested Party:
CNA WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, JP, Lockport, NY, MP, Ochard Park, NY and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
MELISSA ANN GREENLAW, a/k/a Melissa Belanger, a/k/a Melissa Moore
Trinity EMS, Inc. v. Eric D. Hargan
as 1:2017cv12568
Defendant:
Eric Hargan
Plaintiff:
Trinity EMS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1651
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv11474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Velazquez-Pinol v. Casiano Communications, Inc.
as 10-2338
Petitioner:
In re: ALBERTO A. VELAQUEZ-PINOL
Plaintiff:
DE LA RUE CASH SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
EM SYSTEM GROUP, INC.
Ortiz-Troche v. De La Cruz & Associates et al
as 3:2008cv01159
Plaintiff:
Emely Ortiz-Troche
Defendant:
De La Cruz & Associates and Francisco De La Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
