Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Cruz v. IBM Corporation, et al
as 19-1963
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM LAFFERTY, Lowell PD Detective, DAVID RUDE, IBM Manager, JOHN F. AKERS, IBM Chairman and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS A. CRUZ
Jones-Butler v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2015cv11806
Plaintiff:
LaShena Jones-Butler
Defendant:
Martha Coakley, Elizabeth Warren , Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Lucas, et al v. Coakley, et al
as 14-2350
Plaintiff:
JOBS FIRST INDEPENDANT EXPENDITURE POLITAL ACTION COMMITTEE
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELISSA LUCAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTHA COAKLEY and BRIAN MANNAL
Jobs First Independent v. Coakley, et al
as 14-2349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOBS FIRST INDEPENDANT EXPENDITURE POLITAL ACTION COMMITTEE
Plaintiff:
MELISSA LUCAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTHA COAKLEY and BRIAN MANNAL
Massachusetts Association of Private Career Schools v. Coakley
as 1:2014cv13706
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Association of Private Career Schools
Defendant:
Martha Coakley and The Office of the Massachusetts Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Massachusetts Delivery Assoc. v. Coakley
as 13-2307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MASSACHUSETTS DELIVERY ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTHA COAKLEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Interested Party - Amicus Curiae:
STEPHEN REYNOLDS
Interested Party:
ALBERG OLIVEIRA, EZEQUIEL ANTONIO GARCIA, FRANCIS ARRIGO and others
Prall v. Cambridge District Court
as 12-2238
Petitioner:
TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent:
MARTHA COAKLEY, Attorney General
FENNICK v. KITTREDGE et al
as 1:2012cv10866
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fennick
Defendant:
Joseph T. Kittredge, John Staco, Margaret Rubino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vinnie v. Roden, et al
as 11-1866
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND P. VINNIE
Respondent - Appellee:
GARY RODEN, HAROLD W. CLARKE and MARTHA COAKLEY, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
