Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Merced-Nieves v. USA
as 3:2012cv01652
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Walter Merced-Nieves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nieves-Conde v. Commonwealth of PR et al
as 3:2011cv01981
Plaintiff:
Santos Nieves-Conde
Defendant:
Commonwealth of PR, Noe Lugo and Guillermo Somoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Galicia-Nieves v. Torres-Rivera et al
as 3:2011cv01100
Plaintiff:
Edwin Galicia-Nieves
Defendant:
Conchita Torres-Rivera and William Barreto-Barreto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Galicea-Nieves v. Toro et al
as 3:2011cv01099
Plaintiff:
Edwin Galicea-Nieves
Defendant:
Conchita Toro and Edwin Barreto-Barreto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Galicia-Nieves v. Hernandez
as 3:2010cv01791
Plaintiff:
Edwin Galicia-Nieves
Defendant:
Leocardio Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nieves-Conde v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
as 3:2010cv01198
Plaintiff:
Santos Nieves-Conde
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lassalle-Pitre v. Martinez et al
as 3:2009cv02058
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Lassalle-Pitre
Defendant:
Victor Martinez, Fernando Nieves-Camacho, Manuel Acevedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andino-Nieves v. Rivera et al
as 3:2009cv02000
Plaintiff:
Freddie Andino-Nieves
Defendant:
Ramon Rivera, Filomeno Porfirio-Green, Administracion de Correccion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Omar Valle-Nieves v. Pereira-Castillo et al
as 3:2009cv01686
Defendant:
Miguel A. Pereira-Castillo, Carmen Troche and Estado Libre Asociado de P.R.
Plaintiff:
Omar Valle-Nieves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nieves-Conde v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2009cv01315
Plaintiff:
Santos Nieves-Conde
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Administration of Corrections and Correctional Health Services
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
