Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 217
Prevost v. NH State Department Correctional Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00261
Defendant: NH State Department Correctional Services, Cheshire Correctional Facility, NH State Prison for Men Medical Staff and others
Not Classified By Court: NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff: Todd Prevost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bosa v. Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00262
Petitioner: Theo Bosa
Respondent: Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pereira Brito, et al v. Barr, et al
as 20-1119
Petitioner: GILBERTO PEREIRA BRITO, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, FLORENTIN AVILA LUCAS, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and JACKY CELICOURT, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Interested Party: JOHN A. HAWKINSON
Respondent: CHRISTOPHER BRACKETT, Superintendent of the Strafford County Department of Corrections, ANTONE MONIZ, Superintendent of the Plymouth County Correctional Facility, YOLANDA SMITH, Superintendent of the Suffolk County House of Corrections and others
Respondent / Appellee: JAMES MCHENRY, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, YOLANDA SMITH, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, LORI STREETER, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Baptista v. Plymouth Correctional Facility et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv10198
Defendant: Plymouth Correctional Facility, Haarala and Captain Holmes
Plaintiff: Samuel Jose Baptista
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Edmark
as 20-1069
Respondent / Appellee: MICHELLE EDMARK, Warden, Northern NH Correctional Facility
Petitioner / Appellant: JARRELL WILSON
Pereira Brito, et al v. Barr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1037
Respondent / Appellee: ANTONE MONIZ, Superintendent of the Plymouth County Correctional Facility, CHRISTOPHER BRACKETT, Superintendent of the Strafford County Department of Corrections, LORI STREETER, Superintendent of the Franklin County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party: JOHN A. HAWKINSON
Petitioner / Appellant: JACKY CELICOURT, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, GILBERTO PEREIRA BRITO, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, FLORENTINE AVILA LUCAS, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Shaw v. Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden
as 1:2019cv01122
Petitioner: John Shaw
Not Yet Classified: NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Respondent: Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sizemore v. NH Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv00807
Defendant: NH State Prison for Men, Warden, NH State Prison for Men, Northern NH Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff: Mathew Sizemore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Messina v. Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00539
Petitioner: Michael F. Messina, Jr.
Undetermined: NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Respondent: Northern NH Correctional Facility, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Botelho v. Plymouth County Correctional Facility et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv11039
Plaintiff: Michael Botelho
Defendant: Barnstable House of Correction, Plymouth County Correctional Facility, Bethany Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?