Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Perry v. Holmes et al
as 1:2024cv11954
Defendant:
Taha Bali, Captain Hilaire Vladimir Pierre, Lawrence Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Rico Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Collins v. Munya et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Defendant:
Paula Mattis, Melissa Roberds, Tim Popowich and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Eye & Lasik Eye Care Management, LLC et al v. Alfred et al
as 1:2023cv12613
Plaintiff:
Eye & Lasik Eye Care Management, LLC and Eye & Lasik Optical, LLC
Defendant:
Pierre R Alfred, PlanEye, LLC d/b/a The Eye Center and Eye & Lasik Group, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Eye & Lasik Eye Care Management, LLC et al v. Alfred et al
as 4:2023cv12613
Plaintiff:
Eye & Lasik Eye Care Management, LLC and Eye & Lasik Optical, LLC
Defendant:
Pierre R Alfred, PlanEye, LLC d/b/a The Eye Center, Eye & Lasik Group, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Blass v. Archdiocese of Boston
as 1:2023cv12374
Plaintiff:
Frantz Pierre Blass, Jr
Defendant:
Archdiocese of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gonzalez v. Pierre-Mike, et al
as 23-1774
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALBERT GONZALEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
JANAYA PIERRE-MIKE and RICARDO R. CARTER
Gonzalez v. Pierre-Mike et al
as 1:2023cv11665
Petitioner:
Albert Gonzalez
Respondent:
Janaya Pierre-Mike and Ricardo R. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Devol Pond Association et al v. Chris Capone et al
as 1:2023cv11042
Plaintiff:
Devol Pond Association, Robert Hadley, Robert C. Hadley and others
Defendant:
Chris Capone, Paul Joncas, Pamela Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Renart v. Rasier, LLC, et al
as 23-1336
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOAN LAURIE RENART
Defendant / Appellee:
RASIER, LLC, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and GUY PIERRE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
