Cases 1 - 10 of 901
Ware et al v. Cranston Public Schools et al
as 1:2024cv00348
Defendant:
Michael Traficante, Sara Tindall-Woodman, Superintendent Jeannine Nota-Masse and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Mello and Rachel Ware
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00207
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00211
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Wright v. Moniz, et al
as 24-1632
Defendant:
ANTONE MONIZ, Superintendent and MELVIN SPRAGUE, Assistant Superintendent
Plaintiff:
DAVID DAOUD WRIGHT
Duarte v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 24-1544
Defendant:
DANIELLE FRANE, Superintendent, Norfolk County Sheriff's Office, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, NORFOLK COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. DUARTE
Berry v. Kennedy
as 1:2024cv12039
Plaintiff:
William E Berry
Defendant:
Superintendent Stephen A. Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miranda Pizarro v. McDonald et al
as 1:2024cv11547
Plaintiff:
Johanns Miranda Pizarro
Defendant:
Sheriff Joseph D. McDonald, Jr. and Superintendent Antone Moniz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00241
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Armstrong v. Divris
as 4:2024cv40084
Respondent:
Superintendent Matthew J. Divris
Petitioner:
Glenn R. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duarte v. Bridgewater State Hospital, et al
as 24-1545
Defendant:
CHRISTINE HOLCOMB, LICSW, Wellpath Medical, LLC, JOSHUA S. LAPIN, Wellpath Medical, LLC, KYLE WALKER, Medical Director, Wellpath Medical, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. DUARTE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
