Cases 1 - 10 of 26
United States v. Bowens
as 23-6203
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MAURICE TUDOR BOWENS
Davis v. GEO Group, et al
as 21-6099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INC., MARK BOWEN, Warden, RITA HOOD, Major and others
In re: Syngenta AG MIR162
as 21-3121
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GRAY REED & MCGRAW LLP, WATTS GUERRA LLP, GRAY REED & MCGRAW LLP and others
Appellee:
ABREO & CARTER, BARRETT WYLIE, LLC, W. DEAN BELK, JR., Attorney at Law and others
Appellant:
STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP, HARE, WYNN, NEWELL & NEWTON, GRAY REED & MCGRAW, P.C. and others
In re: Syngenta AG MIR162
as 21-3106
Appellee:
BYRON STONE, PLLC, CLINE WILLIAMS WRIGHT JOHNSON & OLDFATHER, LLP, BRIAN FITZWATER LAW OFFICE and others
Appellant:
BUTLER SNOW, LLP, WHITE & ALLEN, P.A., E. RUDOLPH MCINTYRE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B. LEX, TRIPLE BG PARTNERSHIP, DAVID POLIFKA REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST and others
Defendant:
SYNGENTA CORPORATION, SYNGENTA SEEDS, LLC, FKA Syngenta Seeds, Inc., SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG and others
Knox v. Bowen, et al
as 21-6048
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK BOWEN, LCF Administration, SCOTT CROW, Director of DOC and UNKNOWN LCF OFFICIALS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONE LAMANDINGO KNOX
Knox v. Bowen
as 21-6025
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK BOWEN
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTONE LAMANDINGO KNOX
In re: Syngenta Toups/Coffman
as 21-3020
Appellant:
THOMAS P. CALHOUN, III, RICHARD L. COFFMAN, P.C., THOMPSON, GARRETT & HINES and others
Appellee:
STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP, WATTS GUERRA LLP, CARELLA BYRNE CECCHI OLSTEIN BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. and others
Bowens v. Crow
as 20-6172
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRISTIAN DON BOWENS
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, Director of Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Bowens v. Crow
as 20-6157
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRISTIAN DON BOWENS
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, Director of Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
