Cases 1 - 10 of 84
United States v. Trujillo
as 23-1318
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES DAVID TRUJILLO, JR.
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Smith v. United States, et al
as 23-1218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
A. TRUJILLO and GONZALEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNIDENTIFIED CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS
Bedolla-Trujillo v. Garland
as 23-9546
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANCISCO JAVIER BEDOLLA-TRUJILLO
Respondent / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
United States v. Trujillo
as 23-2080
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHNNY C. TRUJILLO
Dimas v. Pecos Independent School District Board, et al
as 23-2064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DE ANZA ANGEL DIMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
PECOS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, PECOS HIGH SCHOOL, MICHAEL FLORES, in his individual capacity and others
Trujillo v. Board of County Commissioners for Weld County, et al
as 23-1124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STACIE R. TRUJILLO and STACIE RAE TRUJILLO
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR WELD COUNTY, STEVE REAMS, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff, CHRISTOPHER BASHLOV, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Sheriff and others
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Saucedo, et al v. Garland
as 22-9560
Petitioner:
MARIELA TRUJILLO SAUCEDO and JOSE L. RIOS MADRIGAL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Encinias v. Hernandez, et al
as 22-2005
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRITNEY ENCINIAS
Defendant / Appellant:
UBALDO HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
JUSTIN SANDERS, CLAYTON TRUJILLO, ROBERT GONZALES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
