Cases 61 - 70 of 15,885
Williams v. USA
as 1:2024cv02433
Petitioner:
Namon Keith Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robledo (PS) v. Executive Director of CDOC et al
as 1:2024cv02430
Petitioner:
C. S. Robledo
Respondent:
Executive Director of CDOC and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duran (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv02441
Petitioner:
Joseph L. Duran and Joseph Louis Duran
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marlow (PS) v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02428
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Marlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander (PS) v. Martinez et al
as 1:2024cv02431
Defendant:
Michaela Martinez
Plaintiff:
Darrick Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan (PS) v. Reid et al
as 1:2024cv02074
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Jordan
Defendant:
Reid, Diggens, Gillespie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kannett v. USA
as 1:2024cv02030
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
Ryan Kannett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson (PS) v. Starr
as 1:2024cv01948
Respondent:
M. Starr
Petitioner:
Caliss Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Holzer (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv01991
Respondent:
Philip J. Weiser and Moses Stancil
Petitioner:
James Brian Holzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larson (PS) v. Stucker et al
as 1:2024cv01979
Petitioner:
Kevin A. Larson
Respondent:
Shane Stucker and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
