Cases 31 - 40 of 108
Medina v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2015cv00200
Petitioner:
Hilario Medina
Respondent:
State of Utah and Alfred Bigelow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Medina v. Falk, et al
as 15-1043
Petitioner - Appellant:
NICK RAUL MEDINA
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES FALK, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Medina v. Jefferson County Courts, Colo.
as 1:2014cv02894
Respondent:
Jefferson County Courts, Colo.
Petitioner:
Nick Raul Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Medina v. Colorado Department of Corrections
as 1:2013cv03339
Plaintiff:
Raymond Medina
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Medina, et al
as 13-1324
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID LEE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden Fremont Correctional Facility and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Medina v. Goodrich et al
as 1:2013cv01898
Petitioner:
Ernest J. Medina
Respondent:
Barry Goodrich
Plaintiff:
Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ontiveros-Perez v. Medina, et al
as 13-1298
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIO ONTIVEROS-PEREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Medina v. Goodrich et al
as 1:2013cv01879
Petitioner:
Ernest J. Medina
Respondent:
Barry Goodrich and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucero v. Medina, et al
as 13-1300
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY LUCERO
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Arellano v. Medina, et al
as 13-1264
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM ARELLANO
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
