Cases 61 - 70 of 129
Bretz v. Clement et al
as 1:2012cv01749
Plaintiff:
Michael Bretz
Defendant:
Tom Clement and Creme
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dmytryszyn v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2012cv01690
Plaintiff:
Adam Dmytryszyn
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Tom Clements, Faulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinkey v. Adams County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 1:2012cv01533
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Pinkey
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff Dept., Tom Clements, Zupan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2012cv01379
Plaintiff:
Eldridge L. Griffin
Defendant:
Roberts, Amy Cosner, Raidah Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sardakowski v. Clements et al
as 1:2012cv01326
Petitioner:
James Sardakowski
Respondent:
Tom Clements, Travis Trani and Kavin Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Clements, et al
as 12-1189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY W. BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM CLEMENTS, Dir, DOC, KEVIN MILYARD, Warden, SCF and ALL OTHER JOHN AND JANE DOE MEDICAL STAFF RESPONSABLE [SIC]
Morgan et al v. Clements et al
as 1:2012cv00936
Plaintiff:
John Morgan , Dustin Cook , Paul Stark and others
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Jeffrey Wells, Jim Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. State of Kansas, et al
as 12-3087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, DON L. SCOTT, Seward County Attorney, TOM SMITH, Seward County District Court Judge and others
Heath v. State of Kansas, et al
as 12-3081
Petitioner - Appellant:
GLENN A. HEATH
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, PATRICIA BIGGS, MIKE O'NIEL and others
Jenkins v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2011cv03231
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Jenkins
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Don L. Scott, Tom Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
