Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Larson Archery v. Martin Sports
as 1:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Larson Archery
Defendant:
Martin Sports
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Larson Archery v. Martin Archery
as 1:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Larson Archery
Defendant:
Martin Archery
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Shattil et al v. American Eagle Radiators, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01494
Plaintiff:
Wendy Shattil and Robert Rozinski
Defendant:
American Eagle Radiators, Inc., American Eagle Radiators, Ltd., Robert Cloke and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Martin v. Candle Queen Candles, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02639
Plaintiff:
Tina Marie Martin
Defendant:
Candle Queen Candles, LLC, Stacy L. McCowen, Beth Michelle Witte and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Floyd's 99 Holdings, LLC v. Jude's Barbershop, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02688
Plaintiff:
Floyd's 99 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Jude's Barbershop, Inc. , Jude's Barbershop- Ottawa, Inc. , Jude's Barbershop- Cascade, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Hargrave v. Chief Asian, LLC, et al
as 11-5112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARTER R. HARGRAVE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIEF ASIAN, LLC and MARTIN ENG
GetAwayToday.com v. NameMedia et al
as 1:2010cv00112
Plaintiff:
GetAwayToday.com
Defendant:
NameMedia, Rare Names, Robert J. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Hargrave v. Chief Asian, LLC et al
as 4:2010cv00006
Plaintiff:
Carter Hargrave
Defendant:
Chief Asian, LLC and Martin Eng
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Masterfile v. Gale et al
as 2:2009cv00966
Plaintiff:
Masterfile, Masterfile and Masterfile
Defendant:
Martin Gale, Laurie Gale and Gale Services
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Dynamic Patents LLC v. Aeon Corporation et al
as 5:2009cv00362
Plaintiff:
Dynamic Patents LLC
Defendant:
Aeon Corporation, Aeon Corporation, M Larry Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
