Cases 101 - 110 of 3,693
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02217
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Rose v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00473
Respondent:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Interested Party:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Petitioner:
William Rose
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Lim v. Eckert et al
as 4:2024cv00470
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Corp, AT&T Services Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lim v. Committee of Bar Examiners of State Bar of California et al
as 4:2024cv00469
Defendant:
AT&T Services Inc, AT&T Corp, AT&T Mobility LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Cutting Edge Vision, LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00270
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cutting Edge Vision, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hall v. Treasurer of the United States, et al.
as 24-3199
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
TREASURER OF THE UNITED STATES, APPLE INC., T-MOBILE US, INC. and others
Lettieri v. T-Mobile US, Inc., et al.
as 24-3088
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARMINE LETTIERI
Defendant:
T-MOBILE US, INC., SUSAN JOHNSON, PAUL E. BUNANNO and others
Silvan v. AT&T Services, et al
as 2:2024cv01229
Not Yet Classified:
Sara Silvan and AT&T Mobility Services
Defendant:
Brian Davis, Yousef Musleh and AT&T Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
