Cases 1 - 10 of 269
Dimick v. Garland
as 1:2024cv02521
Defendant:
Paul Abbate, Alex (I) Zappe, Six Unknown Named Federal Agents and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ryan Dimick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris-Blake (PS) v. Sam Stretton Law et al
as 1:2024cv02435
Defendant:
Textream, Comcast, Amazon.com and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Morris-Blake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sample (PS) v. Shea Apex Merdian East et al
as 1:2024cv02393
Defendant:
Shea Apex Merdian East, Mark N. Tschetter and Apex Merdian II LLC
Plaintiff:
Luke Ryan Sample
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kovac v. Kong Company LLC
as 1:2024cv02287
Plaintiff:
Mark G Kovac
Defendant:
Kong Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02218
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Flemons (PS) v. Hunt
as 1:2024cv01318
Plaintiff:
Joanna Flemons
Defendant:
Mark Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Overturf (PS) v. Overturf et al
as 1:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
Kurt Overturf
Defendant:
Greg Overturf, Lea Overturf, Mark Overturf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gearhart v. University of Colorado Colorado Springs, et al
as 1:2024cv00976
Plaintiff:
Kristen Gearhart
Defendant:
University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Regents of the University of Colorado, The, Mark Tomforde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramsey (PS) v. Boulder Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
JonBenet Ramsey
Defendant:
Boulder Police Department and Mark Wilburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
