Cases 131 - 140 of 823
Nellson v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2021cv00932
Plaintiff:
Edward Nellson
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noe v. United States Government
as 1:2021cv00780
Defendant:
B. True, Berkley, H. Schouweiler and others
Plaintiff:
Peter George Noe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McRae v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 21-4033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN PLATO MCRAE
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FNU FIELDING, FNU CHENEY, Sgt. and others
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00185
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and FNU LNU
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clervrain v. United States, et al
as 21-3040
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Jones v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2021cv03058
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Robert Sarrazin, (fnu) (lnu) (2) and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Locke v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv03051
Defendant:
R. Echols, B. Root, (fnu) Calkers and others
Plaintiff:
Adam A. Locke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Horner et al v. United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2021cv00105
Defendant:
L Howard, CO Watkins, Lt. LaSalle and others
Plaintiff:
John R Horner and Billy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fourstar et al v. Bidden et al
as 1:2021cv00414
Defendant:
Drew Weissman, Jessie Slaughter, Mitch McConnell and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr., Anthony Pacheco, Robert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akers v. Flannigan, et al
as 21-3019
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN SPROUL, Warden, SAM A. CROW, Federal judge, J. PHIL GILBERT, Federal judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
