Cases 11 - 20 of 559
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6140
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McGann v. Gorman
as 1:2024cv01750
Plaintiff:
Sherry McGann
Defendant:
Geoffrey Gorman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 as - Fed. Question - Assault, Libel, Slander
Cassody et al v. Rink et al
as 5:2024cv00595
Defendant:
Cory Rink and Brant Bishop
Plaintiff:
Thomas Cassody and Sherry Cassody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
P. et al v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00406
Defendant:
Duke Energy Benefits Committee, United Behavioral Health, Duke Energy Active Medical Plan PPO Option and others
Plaintiff:
M. P. and Sherri P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Nieto v. B. et al
as 1:2024cv00510
Defendant:
Jerrallyn B., Robert Montoya, Sr, Sherrie B. and others
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ann Nieto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6080
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN GUNTER, MELISSA GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
VanBuskirk, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6079
Plaintiff:
AARON VANBUSKIRK, AUSTIN GUNTER and MELISSA GUNTER
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6078
Plaintiff:
MELISSA GUNTER, AUSTIN GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Davis (PS) et al v. Poellot et al
as 1:2024cv01142
Plaintiff:
Latonya Denise Davis, Curtis Meeks, Jr., Anita Jean Dilworth and others
Defendant:
Sarah Poellot, Sherry, Schimmels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
