Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 5,591
Adebonojo v. Williams, et al
as 24-1269
Petitioner: DAVID ADEBONOJO
Respondent: DEAN WILLIAMS and PHIL WEISER, Attorney General, State of Colorado
Gormley v. Stancil, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 24-1270
Petitioner: KATHLEEN GORMLEY
Respondent: PHIL WEISER, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado and ANDRE STANCIL
Kelly v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
as 1:2024cv00642
Respondent: Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Petitioner: Jonathan Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hackborn v. Parsons, et al
as 24-1264
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and WARDEN PARSONS
Petitioner: DEAN D. HACKBORN
Quinn v. Kansas Attorney General, Office of et al
as 2:2024cv02269
Defendant: Topeka, City of, Kansas Attorney General, Office of, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Plaintiff: Andrew Quinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sears v. Long, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 24-1256
Respondent: RYAN LONG, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Petitioner: CRISTINA W. SEARS
Jing v. Garland
as 24-9540
Petitioner: SHUANGFA JING
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Hume (PS) v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2024cv01623
Plaintiff: Coalin Joshua Hume
Defendant: Attorney General, Clerk of the Court and People of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Wyoming Attorney General et al
as 2:2024cv00120
Petitioner: Terrill Kim Morris
Respondent: State of Wyoming and Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Herrera- Arellano v. Garland
as 24-9539
Petitioner: JOSE MANUEL HERRERA-ARELLANO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?