Cases 1 - 10 of 1,673
Meadows v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2024cv00981
Plaintiff:
Cortez Meadows
Defendant:
Kenneth Ford, William L Dennis, Jami Jarnigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stark v. Town of Frederick et al
as 1:2024cv02601
Defendant:
Bryan Ostler and Town of Frederick
Plaintiff:
Dennis W. Stark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
BuyPD et al v. Houtz
as 2:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
BuyPD and Property Direct
Defendant:
Dennis Houtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Other Contract
Perez et al v. Teton County Hospital District et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Silvia Ruth Sahino Cano, Silvia Ruth Perez and Silvia Ruth Perez (Rep)
Defendant:
Emergency Medicine of Jackson Hole LLC, Jackson Hole Medical Imaging PC, General Surgery Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act
Hobbs v. Unified Government of Kansas City/Wyandotte County, Kansas et al
as 2:2024cv02421
Defendant:
Ellen Hanson, Dennis Ware, Clayton Bye and others
Plaintiff:
Jermeka Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6140
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shaik et al v. Mordy et al
as 6:2024cv00256
Defendant:
Dennis Morris, Carter County Court Clerks Office, Hoyle Holt Allied Services Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Zak Shaik and Baari Ardmore Housing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
