Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Ricky Johnson v. Forsyth County Board of Comm., et al
as 18-10826
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY J. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FORSYTH COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, ANDREW FEE, TOM WILSON and others
Ricky Johnson v. Andrew Fee
as 17-14324
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICKY J. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDREW FEE and LARRY HUGHES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-16848
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Dennis Johnson
as 16-14673
Petitioner:
In re: DENNIS J. JOHNSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Samuel Johnson
as 16-10599
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SAMUEL J. JOHNSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-13518
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-12988
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ricky Johnson v. Ted Paxton, et al
as 15-11929
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY J. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TED PAXTON, Former Sheriff, DUANE PIPER, in his individual and official capacities, FEE and others
Olivette Coffey, Jr., et al v. Dwight Braddy, et al
as 15-11112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLIVETTE COFFEY, JR., HARRY J. JOHNSON, NANCY J. BRACKETT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT BRADDY, in his capacity as a member of the civil service board of the city of Jacksonville Florida, J. C. DEKLE, in his capacity as a member of the civil service board of the city of Jacksonville, Florida, WILLIAM HALLOWES, in his capacity as a member of the civil service board of the city of Jacksonville Florida and others
:
SERVICE
Ricky Johnson v. Forsyth County Board of Commis, et al
as 13-12090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY J. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FORSYTH COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, SHERIFF, TOM WILSON, Major/Jail Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
