Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Music Royalty Consulting, Inc. v. William McLean
as 24-11193
Plaintiff:
MUSIC ROYALTY CONSULTING, INC.
Defendant:
WILLIAM RUDOLPH MCLEAN and WILLIAM MCLEAN
Rudolph Silas v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-12999
Petitioner / Appellant:
RUDOLPH SILAS
Respondent / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
William Shroyer v. Polk County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 23-11721
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM LEE SHROYER
Defendant / Appellee:
POLK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, JOHN DOE, LIEUTENANT RUDOLPH and others
James Cooley v. Danny Woods, et al
as 22-14008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RUDOLPH COOLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
DANNY BRYAN WOODS and CITY OF PENDERGRASS
Rodney Tolbert v. Officer Singleton, et al
as 22-13089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY TOLBERT
Defendant / Appellee:
SINGLETON, CO1 and RUDOLPH
Mark D. Rudolph v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-11171
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK D. RUDOLPH
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Eric Rudolph v. USA
as 21-12828
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC ROBERT RUDOLPH
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Rudolph Kidd
as 21-12118
Defendant / Appellant:
RUDOLPH KIDD
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Woodrow Dixon, Jr.
as 20-14556
Defendant / Appellant:
WOODROW RUDOLPH DIXON, JR., a.k.a. Dro
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rudolph Carneiro, et al v. USCIS District Director, et al
as 20-13298
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUDOLPH CARNEIRO and TATIANA DINIZ-PEREIRA
Defendant / Appellee:
USCIS DISTRICT DIRECTOR SOUTHEAST REGION, Official capacity, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Official capacity, SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
