Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 81 - 90 of 26,800
JORDAN v. DENNY et al
as 5:2024cv00308
Defendant: JOSHUA CRAVEY and OFFICER NICHOLAS DENNY
Plaintiff: RODDRICK O JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00305
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CLEMENTS v. BEASLEY
as 5:2024cv00304
Petitioner: JAMES EDWARD CLEMENTS, JR
Respondent: WARDEN JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00090
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
EARLS et al v. CITIMORTGAGE INC.
as 5:2024cv00302
Defendant: CITIMORTGAGE INC
Plaintiff: PAMELA D. EARLS and JULIAN M EARLS, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
CRANE v. GLEATON
as 5:2024cv00303
Plaintiff: AMY CRANE
Defendant: LT KENNY GLEATON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00088
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
GRIMMAGE v. BELL
as 1:2024cv00135
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and LT EARL BELL
Plaintiff: SEBASTIAN TERAND GRIMMAGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COLLINS v. MARCUS et al
as 7:2024cv00089
Defendant: BAKER, DONTAE EVENS, DELISHA BRYANT and others
Plaintiff: SHAKENO COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLINS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv00085
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Participant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Plaintiff: JONATHAN COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?