Cases 11 - 20 of 823
Lawson v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv14163
Defendant:
Officer T. Rueda, Officer J. Miller, Warden Robert Bryner and others
Plaintiff:
Avion Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00461
Petitioner:
Victor V. Reed
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURZIKE v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Defendant:
JAMES T. MURZIKE, D ELLIS, T THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinner v. Reed et al
as 3:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
Timmy Kinner
Defendant:
Bernard Reed, Mark Perkins, Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00358
Petitioner:
Victor V. Reed
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avion Lawson v. John Holtz, et al
as 24-11153
Plaintiff:
AVION LAWSON
Defendant:
JOHN HOLTZ, V. MALDONADO, RUEDA and others
RUTLEDGE v. DEVORE-GUIFARRO et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Defendant:
BRACHER, E DEVORE-GUIFARRO, BODIFORD and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE VINCENT RUTLEDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pugh v. Fleming et al
as 1:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lendard Pugh and Christopher Lenard Pugh
Defendant:
Officer Robert Fleming, Sheriff Victor Hill, Judge Wonda Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelosi-Dahl v. Johnson
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Zachary V. Pelosi-Dahl
Defendant:
Julie Crews Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier, Kelvin v. Holtz et al
as 2:2024cv14083
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Frazier
Defendant:
J. Holtz, B. Stephenson, C. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
