Miller Act Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 349
The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc. v. Up-Side Management Company, Inc., et al
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff: The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc.
Defendant: Up-Side Management Company, Inc. and Aegis Security Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Galloway-Bell Inc. v. Crowder Industrial Construction, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Galloway-Bell Inc.
Defendant: Crowder Industrial Construction, LLC, Alberici-Mortenson, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Intergrated Construction Management, Inc. v. Wolverine Fire Protection, Co., et al
as 6:2024cv00137
Plaintiff: Intergrated Construction Management, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Mr. Edward J. Kinberg and The United States of America
Defendant: Wolverine Fire Protection, Co., a Michigan corporation, Great American Insurance Company, an Ohio corporation, Wolverine Fire Protection, Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Argos USA, LLC v. Surecrete, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01456
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Argos USA, LLC and United States of America
Defendant: Surecrete, LLC, Dallas Nugent, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America v. Drace Construction Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv05126
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Drace Construction Corp. and U.S. Specialty Insurance Company
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of RQ Construction, LLC v. Siemens Government Technologies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv02118
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of RQ Construction, LLC
Defendant: Siemens Government Technologies, Inc., Federal Insurance Company, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use and benefit of High Point Electric & Fire, LLC et al v. Up-Side Management Company et al
as 1:2023cv00608
Plaintiff: High Point Electric & Fire, LLC, High Point Concrete & Civil, LLC, The United States of America, for the use and benefit of High Point Electric & Fire, LLC and others
Defendant: Up-Side Management Company and On-Point Risk Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act NEW
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00597
Plaintiff: The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc.
Defendant: Up-Side Management Company, Inc. and Aegis Security Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc. v. Up-Side Management Company, Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv00597
Plaintiff: The United States of America, for the use of Midsouth Paving, Inc.
Defendant: Up-Side Management Company, Inc. and Aegis Security Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act NEW
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Everest Reinsurance Co. et al
as 9:2023cv81366
Plaintiff: United States of America f/u/b SiteOne Landscape Supply, LLC, SiteOne Landscape Supply, LLC and United States of America
Defendant: Everest Reinsurance Co., G&C Fab-Con LLC, Sunflower Landscaping, Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?