Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Office of the Attorney General of the State of Florida v. Alliance Moving and Storage LLC et al
as 0:2024cv61217
Defendant:
First Priority Van Lines LLC, Alliance Moving and Storage LLC, American Movers and Storage LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Office of the Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Office of the Attorney General of the State of Florida v. Alliance Moving and Storage LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80843
Defendant:
Alliance Moving and Storage LLC, First Priority Van Lines LLC, American Movers and Storage LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Office of the Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Sileo v. National Van Lines
as 2:2019cv00489
Plaintiff:
Richard Sileo
Defendant:
National Van Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sileo v. National Van Lines
as 2:2019cv00488
Plaintiff:
Richard Sileo
Defendant:
National Van Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stassen v. Bev Smith of Ft. Pierce II, Inc.
as 2:2016cv14484
Plaintiff:
Richard Stassen
Defendant:
Bev Smith of Ft. Pierce II, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Richards v. Charles D. Franken, P.A.
as 0:2014cv62705
Plaintiff:
Gloria Richards
Defendant:
Charles D. Franken, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fasanella v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
as 9:2008cv80836
Defendant:
Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard Fasanella
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Creative Desperation, Inc. et al v. Moxon et al
as 0:2008cv60984
Plaintiff:
Creative Desperation, Inc. formerly known as Peter Letterese & Associates, Inc. doing business as Galileo Systems International, Peter Letterese & Associates, Inc. and Peter Letterese
Defendant:
Kendrick L. Moxon, Moxon and Kobrin PA, Church of Scientology International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
