Cases 1 - 10 of 25
DAKER v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv02687
Respondent:
Otis Stanton, Brian Dennis Adams, Justin Jones and others
Petitioner:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Allen v. All 7 continents et al
as 4:2024cv00139
Defendant:
MD Du, MD Pise, Shepherd and others
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullis v. Shepherd
as 8:2023cv02245
Plaintiff:
William Tony Mullis, Jr.
Defendant:
Deputy Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepherd v. Quispe
as 3:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
George A. Shepherd, Jr.
Defendant:
Juan Quispe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrington v. White et al
as 8:2022cv02633
Defendant:
Brooke P. Boldin, Thomas White, Jim Kane and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Lee Harrington, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, AHMAD HOLT, CLAY NIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, FACILITIES DIRECTOR JACK KOON, JOHNNY SIKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v WARD et al
as 7:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTHONY PARKER, JR
Defendant:
TIMOTHY WARD, STAN SHEPHERD, SHAWN EMMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PORTER v. HAMILTON et al
as 5:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
STEVIE PORTER
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN DONAVON HAMILTON, ADMINISTRATOR PAT CLARK, CLINICAL SUPERVISOR C MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
