Cases 31 - 40 of 864
Wills v. Howard et al
as 7:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Damien Wills
Defendant:
C Howard, TD Brown, T Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Hamilton v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamilton
Defendant:
Victor Hill, Roland Boehrer, Terrance Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sellers v. Mullen
as 1:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Allen Sellers
Defendant:
Leonard Mullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bohannon v. Brown, et al
as 1:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
William T. Bohannon
Defendant:
Tiki Brown, Acting Sheriff Roland Boehrer, Sheriff Levon Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Caudle v. Department of Justice=DOJ et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Allen Okechukwu Caudle
Defendant:
Department of Justice=DOJ, Department Of Defense=DOD, National Reconnaissance Office=NRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bahakel v. Allen et al
as 2:2023cv01652
Plaintiff:
S Phillip Bahakel
Defendant:
Wes Allen and Alabama Republican Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
O'Neal v. Harris et al
as 3:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Cameron R. O'Neal
Defendant:
Allen Harris and City of Dublin, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
