Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Boglin v. Daniel et al
as 5:2024cv00784
Defendant:
Michael Rains, Kenneth Sims, Downtown Rescue Mission and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Earl Boglin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Barberi v. THE SMILE MISSION PLLC et al
as 1:2024cv22201
Defendant:
THE SMILE MISSION PLLC and DUSTIN'S REAL ESTATE LLC
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00284
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Pittman v. Atlanta Missions
as 1:2024cv02108
Defendant:
Atlanta Missions
Plaintiff:
Nadira Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Davis v. Mallards Landing Associates, LTD.
as 3:2023cv01148
Plaintiff:
Brenda Davis
Defendant:
Mallards Landing Associates, LTD. doing business as Mission Pointe Apartments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CITY WALK - URBAN MISSION INC et al v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE
as 4:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
CITY WALK - URBAN MISSION INC., RENEE MILLER, ANTHONY MILLER and others
Defendant:
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Phillips v. Miami Rescue Mission et al
as 1:2022cv20147
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Phillips
Defendant:
Miami Rescue Mission, Jeffrey Tew, Pete A. Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
