Cases 11 - 20 of 397
Smith v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Courtney M. Smith
Defendant:
David Jones, David Martinez, Leroy D. Dale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Palmore v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Polk County)
as 8:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Clarence Leroy Palmore
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Leroy Wilson, III v. Telfair SP Warden
as 23-13960
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEROY WILSON, III
Respondent / Appellee:
TELFAIR SP WARDEN
Thomas v. Morrison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Michael LeRoy Thomas
Defendant:
J. Morrison and P. Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Edwards
as 4:2023cv01321
Petitioner:
David Leroy Cox, Jr
Respondent:
George Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Highberger
as 1:2023cv04362
Petitioner:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Respondent:
J. Highberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Rock (Marion County)
as 5:2023cv00473
Petitioner:
Leroy Crowder Reed, Jr.
Respondent:
Denise Rock and Secretary Florida Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Morrison et al
as 2:2023cv01009
Petitioner:
Michael LeRoy Thomas
Respondent:
J Morrison and P Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gresham v. Centurion et al
as 8:2023cv01704
Plaintiff:
Leroy Gresham
Defendant:
Centurion, Hardee CI Medical Department, APRN N Wishon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
