Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Woods v. Florida Attorney General et al
as 3:2010cv00812
Plaintiff:
Dannis Conrol Woods
Defendant:
Florida Attorney General, Rosanna S. Seay and Union Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaarbay v. Rhynehardt et al
as 3:2010cv00632
Plaintiff:
Carlos Shaarbay
Defendant:
Rhynehardt, Flemings, Sgt. Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCallup v. Goss Bonding Company et al
as 4:2010cv01528
Plaintiff:
Veronica McCallup
Defendant:
Goss Bonding Company, Ch Harsett, Easy Bonding Company and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCallup v. Boone et al
as 4:2010cv01444
Plaintiff:
Veronica McCallup
Defendant:
Carol Boone, State of Alabama, Markum and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seay v. City of Homewood Police Department, Chief
as 7:2009cv02454
Plaintiff:
Leonard Seay, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Homewood Police Department, Chief
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Meres et al
as 3:2009cv01173
Plaintiff:
Dannis Carol Woods
Defendant:
I. Meres, Rosanna S. Seay, Sandra Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rose v. St Clair County et al
as 2:2009cv00727
Plaintiff:
James Jacob Rose, Jr
Defendant:
St Clair County, Terry Marcum, James Hill and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GILLIS v. GUZMAN et al
as 5:2008cv00362
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW GILLIS
Defendant:
GUZMAN, JOHN SEAY, PELT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Seay v. Medical Department of Polk County Jail et al
as 8:2008cv01963
Plaintiff:
Daryl Seay
Defendant:
Medical Department of Polk County Jail and Adrian Saenz
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
