Cases 51 - 60 of 157
Mitchell v. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv01328
Defendant:
Dept Of Corrections and New River C.I.
Plaintiff:
James Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv24120
Defendant:
New River C.I. and Dept. of Corrections
Plaintiff:
James Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grissom v. CNN et al
as 1:2019cv04206
Plaintiff:
Dr. Nathan LaRon Grissom
Defendant:
USP Atlanta, Viacom, Fox News and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Howell et al
as 7:2019cv01391
Defendant:
Pastor Chris Hodges, Sgt. Brown, Sheriff Denis Green and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aquino v. Cesar et al
as 1:2019cv23413
Defendant:
Julio Cesar, Channel 10 News and Victor T. Guitierrez
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Aquino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALMONTE v. NEW YORK STATE et al
as 4:2019cv00174
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE, CORRECTIONAL STATE PRISON OF NEW YORK STATE and CORRECTIONAL GUARD
Plaintiff:
JUAN CARLOS ALMONTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Stoneman et al
as 1:2019cv21153
Defendant:
Douglas Highschool and School Board, Central Intelligence Agency, Kyle Kasheb and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Philippeaux v. United States Of America et al
as 0:2019cv60617
Defendant:
The Coral Springs Police Department, The Drug Enforcement Agency, The Southern District of New York and it's Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Philander Philippeaux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
HEARD v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS INC et al
as 4:2019cv00111
Defendant:
NEW LEAF MARKETS INC and PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS INC
Plaintiff:
DOYE L HEARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARD v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS INC et al
as 3:2019cv00447
Defendant:
NEW LEAF MARKETS INC and PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS INC
Plaintiff:
DOYE L HEARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
