Cases 1 - 10 of 228
HEARNS v. HALE et al
as 4:2024cv00295
Defendant:
FRANCES J ALLMEN, JONATHAN SJOSTROM and ROBERT C HALE
Plaintiff:
JULIUS L HEARNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston Harrison v. Marvin Wiggins, et al
as 24-12287
Defendant:
HALE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, HALE COUNTY ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ERICA K. KEMMER and others
Plaintiff:
WINSTON L. HARRISON
HALE v. JENKINS-SIMMONS et al
as 5:2024cv00284
Defendant:
THORNTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, SHERYL JENKINS-SIMMONS and COMMANDOR MITCHELL
Plaintiff:
COLBY JEROME HALE EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hale v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam)
as 3:2024cv00533
Petitioner:
Adam Hale
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Lane et al
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Freddie J. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Lane, Hale, Lance Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale Harris v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10767
Petitioner:
HALE R. HARRIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Owens, Jr. v. Crews et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Lane, C. Crews, A. Figueroa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon v. Hale et al
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Shecorey D. Shannon
Defendant:
Michael J. Hale and Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALE v. HALE et al
as 3:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEE HALE
Defendant:
SHERIFF JAMES HALE and OCONEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Hale et al
as 2:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Hale
Defendant:
Sheriff James Hale and Oconee County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
