Cases 1 - 10 of 176
Owens v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hernando County)
as 8:2024cv02040
Petitioner:
Love Owens, III
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alfredo Bless v. Ricky Dixon, et al
as 24-12061
Defendant:
J. LOVE, FRANCE/FRANTZ, LOURDES CHACON-HERNANDEZ and others
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO BLESS
Yasamael v. Rhodebeck et al
as 6:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Lugman Abdual Yasamael and Jerome Greer
Defendant:
Terry Alcornelia, David R Love and Margaret Rhodebeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. LOVE
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD CAMPBELL
Defendant:
LOVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Scandrett et al
as 1:2024cv01984
Plaintiff:
Tariq D. Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Reginald Scandrett, Officer K. Crosby, Officer Lyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-11106
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Love, Johnathan v. Corrections Volusia County
as 1:2024cv20675
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Love
Defendant:
Corrections Volusia County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arroyo, Gerado v. Warden Love
as 9:2024cv80135
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Arroyo
Defendant:
Warden Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LOVE v. FEDERAL BEREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et al
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LOVE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MACON STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
