Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Barfield v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Barfield
Defendant:
S. Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES BAILEY, III
Defendant:
THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL, INSPECTOR GENERAL, ANGELA GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STROUD v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00235
Defendant:
GARY SCOTT STROUD, RICKY DIXON, AWP K STANFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HARRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
MILTON KENT JOHNSON
Defendant:
MRS HARRISON, MR WILLIAMS, DR NWAUBEZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HARRISON et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
MILTON KENT JOHNSON
Defendant:
MRS HARRISON, MR WILLIAMS, DR NWAUBEZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BONILLA-BONILLA v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
MARVIN BONILLA-BONILLA
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTRAL STATE PRISON, JOHN BARFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNSON v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2022cv00319
Plaintiff:
Jerome Dunson and JEROME DUNSON, SR
Defendant:
GREGORY SAMPSON, TRACY JEFFERSON, MICHEAL THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Davis et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Jacobs
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis and Trey Barfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00777
Plaintiff:
Tabeus Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis, Trae Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENT v. LAKE et al
as 4:2021cv00355
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L DENT
Defendant:
CLIFTON LAKE, ERICA BARFIELD, KRISTEN PIAZZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
